Stan Consulting · Marketing Atlas · Case Files · Attribution Cluster

Attribution.

Updated May 2026 · Attribution case files · written diagnostic

Case files on numbers that disagreed with each other. Three platforms, four sources of truth, and a CFO asking which one is real.

Diagnostic bridge

Business implication.

Reference use: Reports, tracking, or dashboards do not match what the business sees in revenue. The owner may fund the wrong move because the numbers path does not match the money path. Keep this as an authority reference, then use the route table to decide the next check.

Concept signalBusiness problemNext checksNext route
Symptom matchReports, tracking, or dashboards do not match what the business sees in revenue.Compare the concept to the visible business symptom before changing the channel, page, or budget.Read the problem
Proof needThe idea needs evidence before it becomes a work order.Review the closest proof file for the same failure pattern.Review proof
Execution laneThe failing layer appears specific enough to scope work.Use the service route only when the constraint is named.See service
Unknown layerThe account, site, offer, tracking, or follow-up path may still be the leak.Get the written diagnostic before another rebuild, retainer, or budget increase.Get diagnosis

Have a case that looks like one of these.

The diagnostic reads the operating account, not the brief. Three hours, written deliverable, the structural decomposition of where the spend actually went.

Conversion Second Opinion All Case Files