Skip to main content

Learn · conversion DIY

How to choose landing page colors.

Pick colors by the work they have to do: reading, proof, action, error recovery, and trust. Taste comes later.

Landing pages Contrast CTA hierarchy
Premium landing page color system board with action color, contrast chips, form path, and restrained palette
Generated SC visual · landing page color system

Short answer

A landing page does not need many colors. It needs a small system the buyer can read without thinking.

Use one strong text color, one quiet background, one action color, one proof/accent color, and one warning/error color. Everything else should earn its place.

The CTA color should not be chosen because it "pops." It should be the only color that consistently means action. The buyer learns the rule as they move down the page.

Build the palette

Six decisions before the first button.

Choose the authority color.

This is usually the darkest brand color. It carries headlines, navigation, and serious claims. It should not fight the CTA.

Choose the reading color.

Body copy needs stable contrast on the actual background. If the visitor squints, the color system is already broken.

Choose one action color.

Primary CTAs, form submit buttons, and purchase actions should share one visible action rule. Secondary links can be quieter.

Choose proof accents.

Badges, quotes, screenshots, logos, and result callouts need enough contrast to be seen without stealing the action color.

Choose error and warning states.

Forms need visible error states, focus states, and disabled states. Do not use the main CTA color for every state.

Write the CSS tokens.

Name the colors by job: text, background, action, proof, warning, muted, rule. Hex codes alone do not stop drift.

Diagnostic table

What color problems usually mean.

Visible symptomLikely causeCheck next
CTA colors change from section to section.No action-color rule or too many inherited component styles.Audit all button classes and map each one to primary, secondary, disabled, or destructive.
Hero is beautiful but hard to read.Image overlay, text color, and background contrast were chosen by taste.Run the hero in mobile crop and test headline, subhead, and CTA contrast.
Forms feel low-trust.Inputs, labels, focus states, and errors are too quiet or inconsistent.Test the form with a real failed submission and inspect every state.
Proof cards look decorative.Accent color is being used as decoration instead of evidence routing.Separate proof accents from action colors and link proof to the next decision.
Long pages feel tiring.Low contrast, noisy accents, or no visual hierarchy between sections.Reduce colors before adding sections. The page may need less visual vocabulary.

Resources worth using

Tools before taste.

WCAG text contrast

Use WCAG contrast guidance for readable text, especially body copy, forms, and small UI labels.

Open W3C

WCAG non-text contrast

Buttons, borders, focus indicators, form controls, and chart marks need contrast too.

Open W3C

WebAIM checker

Fast manual contrast checks for foreground and background pairs.

Open WebAIM

Adobe Color

Useful for building a restrained palette and checking accessibility before CSS drift starts.

Open Adobe Color

Coolors

Useful for palette exploration. Keep the generated palette under page-job control.

Open Coolors

Material color guidance

Useful for thinking in design tokens and UI states instead of one-off color choices.

Open Material Design

When the color audit points to a larger page leak.

If the page has weak color hierarchy and weak action logic, it may be a conversion problem, not a palette problem. Check the page message, proof, form, mobile view, and offer path together.